Version of your manuscript that specifies the edits made. In addition to a clean copy of the manuscript, please also upload a 'track-changes' The original submission and mention any additional citations in your response.Ģ. You should also cite any additional relevant literature that has been published since Should be responded to individually, point by point. TheĮntire set of reviewer comments should be present in full and each specific point Do not selectively quote paragraphs or sentences to reply to. *NOTE: In your point-by-point response to the reviewers, please provide the full context Indicate the changes made to the manuscript. Requests, present a point-by-point response to all of the reviewers' comments, and A 'Response to Reviewers' file - this should detail your responses to the editorial The following files along with your revised manuscript:ġ. Your revisions should address the specific points made by each reviewer. Journal please notify us by email if you do not intend to submit a revision so that Please email us ( if you have any questions or concerns, or would like to request an extension.Īt this stage, your manuscript remains formally under active consideration at our We expect to receive your revised manuscript within 3 months. Your revised manuscript is likely to be sent for further evaluation by all or a subset We have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Given the extent of revision needed, we cannot make a decision about publication until To invite you to revise the work to thoroughly address the reviewers' reports. In light of the reviews, which you will find at the end of this email, we would like Point from reviewer #1 about the role of trehalose. The Academic Editor asked me to emphasise the Ways to support the findings by orthogonal means. Needs extra support one of his/her requests is to attempt the perturbation of pHĪnd/or viscosity in order to nail the causality s/he also suggests several other Reviewer #2 says this is “potentially exciting” but Reviewer #1 has several requests, two of which might involve You'll see that the reviewers are all broadly positive, but each has a number of concerns With relevant expertise, and by three independent reviewers. It has now been evaluated by the PLOS Biology editors, an Academic Editor The yeast cytoplasm and the solubility of its proteome" was peer-reviewed at PLOSīiology. Thank you for your patience while your manuscript "Exit of spore dormancy transforms If you consent to posting your current manuscript as a preprint,įeel free to email us at if you have any queries relating to your submission. Opt-in to posting your pre-review manuscript as a bioRxiv preprint. In full and a point-by-point reply detailing how you have or plan to address the reviewers'ĭuring the process of completing your manuscript submission, you will be invited to To the reviews as a 'Prior Peer Review' file type, which should include the reports Letter to let us know and include the name of the journal where the work was previouslyĬonsidered and the manuscript ID it was given. If you would like us to consider previous reviewer reports, please edit your cover Needed, although we aim to avoid this as far as possible. Invite additional reviewers if we consider that additional/independent reviewers are Reports and share the reviewer identities. Will depend on the willingness of the previous journal to confirm the content of the Of the previous reviews is entirely optional and our ability to use them effectively Is willing to work with those reviews in order to avoid re-starting the process. If your manuscript has been previously peer-reviewed at another journal, PLOS Biology To Editorial Manager ( ) within two working days, i.e. To provide the metadata for your submission, please Login After your manuscript has passed the checks it willīe sent out for review. Once your full submission is complete, your paper will undergo a series of checks The Action Links and complete all additional questions in the submission questionnaire. Needing Revisions' folder on your homepage. This end, please login to Editorial Manager where you will find the paper in the 'Submissions Your submission by providing the metadata that is required for full assessment. However, before we can send your manuscript to reviewers, we need you to complete That we would like to send your submission out for external peer review. Your manuscript has now been evaluated by the PLOS Biology editorial staff, as wellĪs by an academic editor with relevant expertise, and I'm writing to let you know The yeast cytoplasm and the solubility of its proteome" for consideration as a Research Thank you for submitting your manuscript entitled "Exit of spore dormancy transforms
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |